Define Puritanism and Democracy and show how they were a mixed legacy.

From Inequality to Equality In Puritanism and Democracy: A Mixed Legacy, Stephen Foster shows how, clientele their assumptions of inequality, the regimen established in Massachusetts by the Puritans, evolved into nearlything that was neer intended; a government based on democracy. To be a Puritan was to be a member of that the most important corpse of citizenry since the Apostles (pg 23). Puritans felt it was their job, their announce duty, to establish a elegant society based on Gods word. They would be as a Citty upon a Hill, the eies of all population are upon them (pg 24). Meaning they believed they would be this pure, godly society that the residue of the world would nonice and strive to emulate. They love their Mother England real ofttimes and were hoping to purge from her Catholicism, and their acceptability for things non of God. After they created a booming godly society, they believed they would be sufficient to go spinal tugboat to England and re-create it there. Puritans were mostwhat bigoted and seemed to believe that if somebody did not believe as they did, thus that mortals sound judgment did not matter. When mortal did try to voice an opinion that was different from theirs, then that person was considered a heretic and was squeeze out of town.

The Puritans did re-create some of the English ways and techniques as they saw necessary, but they did not re-create all of them. The Puritans believed firmly in building a society based on biblical principle derived from the record as interpreted by the elected few. Puritan lucky values called not secure for swell bookkeeping, but for subordination, inequality, authority, unity, suppress of the individual will for the good of the whole (pg 25). Basically, this amounted to the society agreeing that what they were... If you demand to get a near essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper