Atkins V Virginia

1 Criminal Justice 222 23 June 2012 The court sign Atkins vs. Virginia is discussing the let go that ment every last(predicate)y slow down people organism rewarded the death penalty. The watchword is that, are they capable of knowing the balance between redress and wrong? When people are retarded does it affect their ethical motive and the way they look at situations? Does it affect the decisions they make and does it bushel the control they have on their emotions? Are their impulses clouded? Or could it be that people enactment as mental retards near to get slack? This court cuticle was a major(ip) move in figuring bulge out the decision in these type of cases dealing with mentally retarded people. This June 20th , 2002 case was a landmark decision by the US overbearing Court in reversing a creator statutes founded in the case of Penry v. Lynaugh in 1889. The issue of the carrying into action of mentally challenged individuals was first address in the case of Penry v Lynaugh in 1889. In a 5-4 decision the Supreme Court rule that the execution of mentally challenged individuals is not a violation of the ordinal Amendment. The APA found that there were two principle reasons that led to this decision.

(1) the disabilities that take after mental deceleration are directly relevant to the illegal responsibility and select of punishment, and (2) the degree of reduction in object lesson blameworthiness ac t by a defendants mental slowing renders im! position of the death penalty unconstitutional (www.deathpenaltyinfo.org ) Even though Georgia and Massachusetts banned the execution of the mentally challenged at the time, the court found that not full states had formed a national consensus on the matter. Exactly how did all this come or so? What Cates 2 led up to this Supreme Court landmark retroversion? Approximately midnight in August 16, 1996, Atkins and...If you want to get a full essay, fix up it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper