'Ethical Consideration Project\r'

'The health tending delivery system is forever changing it allow for continue to impact the kinds of work that are provided by apparitionally affiliated institutions. The quest of increased health attention coverage and entranceway at decreased cost get out doubtless result in market and legal pressure on Catholic sponsored infirmarys that provide health supervise, because it would break their ethical, moral, and ghostlike principles. Currently, the law does not compel unearthly institutions to provide bang that does not comport with their beliefs this is a means that has to stop especially concerning the well-being of the patient.\r\nThis repetitive evolution of ethical, moral, and religious health care delivery, however, threatens to diminish, if not completely shut down the ability of these sectarian hospitals to maintain control over the kinds of medical care that they provide. Specifically, in this era pervasive federal and asseverate regulations of health care delivery will put in pressure on religious providers to give care flat if it is against their philosophical foundation or they will risk the chance of going out of argument because of the lack of regime funding like Medicare and Medicaid.\r\nThe states involvement of reform and the provisional requirement of health care services are now increasing even more, hospitals are now more reliant on government funding so there is a tension between Catholic hospital and government to give patients the proper care that is needed which is not based on moral beliefs. Because Catholic hospitals much cite religious, and moral beliefs as the bases for rejecting patient demands for abortion, and in this field of study the cockcrow after oral contraceptive as discussed in the Brownfield case this looming conflict between religious freedom and patient access for care will continue to grow.\r\nThis growing conflict has brought difficulty to the legal, social, and to the constitution makers w ho must attempt to resolve this issue. In the Brownfield case the morning-after pill prevents fertilization or inhibits implantation of the fertilized egg. A pamper victim should have the necessary interference available or get referred to another hospital and in an event that they are not given(p) the proper treatment they should have a feasible claim for medical malpractice. I agree with the termination that was made by the judge and here is my reasoning.\r\nIf the morning after pill is given to a rape victim it stops the attachment of a foetus which was conceived under a vicious crime which would not be considered an abortion since the morning after pill has prevented the attachment. I think that it is a patient’s right to control their own health care and that this should prevail over any hospitals moral and religious convictions, because we as patients need to know what is available and the trump treatment out there to insure our well-being.\r\n'