Saturday, February 2, 2019
Homosexuality Essay -- Gay Lesbian Homosexual Essays
Homo informalityMy frustration with debate ab away homoism stems not so much from the arguments themselves, but the actual method of argument. Often, devil well(p)s will approach the topic from two radic every last(predicate)y different expert fields. One may be a New Testament bookman and thus draws out the intricacies of Romans 118-28 and the true meaning of the word homosexual offender (i.e. older man sleeping with a young boy) in that case. The other may be a biologist who appeals to natural logic and reproduction to defend sex as a behavior meant for heterosexuals. twain of them are right within their own expertise. But they cannot, then(prenominal), debate, for it would be equivalent Chuck pitching to a batter on another baseball field.I was pleasantly surprised, then, when Via and Gagnon approached the issue of homosexuality from the same basisthe rule book. If and so homosexuality is to be embraced (or rejected) by the church building as a authentic expressi on of ones being, then one cannot dismiss the Bible as only part of the argument. Behind almost every denominational tradition, the Bible stands as a primary source of wisdom/ morality/practice that, even if its inerrancy is being questioned more recently, cannot be discounted so easily. Approaches Therefore, they two come to scripture as authoritative, though both also hear it through a historical/cultural critics lens. Gagnon certainly takes the position that the venerable Testament and New Testament commandments condemning homosexual practices are absolute, apothegm that a purely scientific renege of multiple biblical instructions is not enough. As scripture interprets scripture, he points out that Ezekiel, Jude, and other texts all support homosexualities blanket condemnation. Via seems m... ..., they should not act upon them in a sexual way, as they can be fully alive without sex. Some questions I still harbor If homosexuality is something God has given humanity as a sig n of Gods wrath (as Via implies) and not unavoidably a sin, ought we still accept it? Can we take the Leviticus passage out of context and put it with the impure laws about menstruation when it actually rests betwixt a verse about not sacrificing to idols (obviously against both OT and NT law) and having sex with animals? If we can, then we may make the case that beastiality was just an impurity law and is instanter a legitimate form of sexual expression. Should we make decisions in the Church based on what is best for the whole body in toll of acceptance and love of people (so that others may be more undetermined to hearing the gospel message), even if it may be wrong tally to scripture?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment