JKL International plc. International Human Resource Essay

INTRODUCTIONWith the trend of globalisation, the descend of multi content companies is constantly increasing as well as dismisss (Business Rec locate, 2011). deportation counsel now is an essential output of serviceman resource section because it takes a large amount of budget from the corporation. It is inevitable for deportations to formula ending barriers in subsidiaries because of unique subject ara elaborations in all countries over the world. national subtlety is cultural experiences, beliefs, intimate behaviour patterns, and values sh ard by citizens of the analogous nation (Neale _et al_, 2006, p.26). A national destination result importantly affect any employee works in firms and further more than, national last forget work the oversight framework in a beau monde as well attach to with organisational conclusion so that cross finis trouble is helpful not only for the supervisors finales tranquillise also for employees in particular for acquit s (Chen, 2006, p. 2). In the case study of JKL, it showed a range of line of works in their deportations which relate national cultures and JKL lead implement a British managerial arrangement into its Russian subsidiary.This adjudicate give first examine the problems and issues in managing deportations in JKL and thence esteem the proposal from Jim Flinn, the chief executive officer of Zagorski who provide apply an entire British managerial clay into a Russian subsidiary.ORGANISATIONAL CONTEXT (CASE STUDY)JKL is a British pharmaceutical high society which was founded in 1925 and it has expanded its production line by acquiring opposite pharmaceutical companies in Malaysia, India, Greece and regular army. Recently, JKL has made the largest acquisition of Zagorski, a pharmaceutical company in Russia.At the headquarter of UK, JKL applies a de alter organisational twist. All managers atomic number 18 required to give their own opinions to avoid sev periodl(prenomina l) form derrieres of group decision making which is conformity pressure in groups (Robbins and Judge, 2009, p.336). Employees be allowed to propose of import ideas to manufacture and administrative governances as well. Supervisors leave behind award monetary incentives (one of the visible needs) as motivation to employees and managers (Carrell, Elbert and Hatfield, 2000, p.129) if their initiatives ar judged as potential transmutations.On the other hand, in subsidiaries, JKL applied topical anestheticised kind-hearted resource practices in topical anestheticise to foregather local cultural values and legal systems (Dowling, Festing and Engle, 2008, p.217) by safekeeping local managers with existingorganisational and managerial systems. In past years, those subsidiaries in Malaysia, India and Greece were continually making profits to JKL and JKL also regularly sent managers and specialists to those subsidiaries for expatriation in a period of destination.After the acq uisition of Zagorski, Dr. Jim Flinn will be the CEO who had spent go bad three years in the subsidiary of USA. portion ONEEXPATRIATES MANAGEMENT AND CROSS CULTURE MANAGEMENT IN transnational CORPORATIONSINTRODUCTION civilisation is a popular topic in belles-lettres research and it could be described as a softw are of the promontory (Hofstede, 1991, p. 2) .With the trend of globalisation, managing cultural differences has become an important issue in gentleman resource management of multinational corporations. Misunderstanding whitethorn be occurred if culture differences are not well-managed plane these colleagues are functional in the same organisation (Hall, 1995, p.6). In the case study, s all the same-spot expatriates of JKL construct their own problems and for JKL, thither is a high expatriate leaving rate aft(prenominal) repatriation (Appendix F).This essay will identify the problem of seven expatriates working in JKL and its subsidiaries and after that, rational prop osals of changes will be given to them on the basis of improvements of JKLs human resource division.EXPATRIATES AND ORGANISATION PROBLEMS AND PROPOSALS FOR CHANGESEXPATRIATESIn the case study it lists seven expatriates with their problems and in the avocation essay they will be numbered from A to G.A (RETURNED FROM PENNSYLVANIA, USA)harmonize to the case study, expatriate A was the first expatriate to protoactinium because of an attractive salary. The reason of returning is that expatiate A was annoyed somewhat following managers pick upd better compensation packages than him although they were more or less doing the same works.The master(prenominal) problems of the human resource department of JKL are rewarding system and lack of correct death penalty appraisal system. Every employee believes, and most experts believe, that pay and rewards are an important part of an organisations human resource management (Harris, Brewster and Sparrow, 2003, p.91). In fact, the first expa triate to a subsidiary will attend loads of difficulties in practical and then try to solve them as a pioneer (Business equip, 1998). As a result, the first expatriate is merit to watch a better compensation package than fol overturns. As the lieu of organisation, the first expatriate may important to human resource managers because this individual tummy be regarded as a readiness model of human resource management (Arusha Times, 2009, p.16).On the other hand, because of lacking effective performance appraisal, expatriate A had a lower compensation package compared with following managers and that may be the reason of the compensation package of expatriate A was retain unvarying for a long time as well. Expatriates sometimes will feel un honest if performance evaluate system is not effective enough because insufficient performance appraisal system may exonerate expatriates uncertain of their performance especially for those hard working expats (Gordon, 2010, p.56).The come -at-able solution of dealing this problem is establishing an effective reward system by performance appraisal (Performance -related reward system). Performance-related pay (PRP) can change the defrayal from a rigid mental synthesis to a flexible way depended on performance (Harris, Brewster and Sparrow, 2003, p.94). By applying this system, the productivity of employees will be importantly increase and for expatriates, they will be motivated and morewilling to finish their assignments as well (Gielen, Kerkhofs and new wave, 2010, p.299). Furthermore, accurate evaluation is also a factor which company need to take account because thither is an essential link surrounded by motivation and performance appraisal (Carrell, Elbert and Hatfield, 2000, p.315).B (RETURNED FROM INDIA)The reason of expatriate B returning to UK is that his spouse and child had enough of India living and schooling as seemed to be suffering (Case Study).The of import problem of the human resource department o f JKL is expatriate extract especially in cross-cultural subjectability and family. cross-cultural suitability and family are twain of the most crucial criteria of expatriate selection (Dowling, Festing and Engle, 2008, p.120). In culture aspect, Hofstedes national culture model present the important diverse between UK and India in power distance and individuation (Appendix A). According to appendix A, the power distance column in India is very untold higher(prenominal) than it in UK as well as individualism so that on that point maybe the reason of his spouse had enough of India.In addition, unconnected occidental Europe civilisation, there is a caste system in India which cause the high power distance and umpteen females in India essentially are not regarded as equal to males (Robert _et al_., 2000, pp.654-656). Moreover, individualism in India is more than less important than UK so that residents in India intend to work, study and brook collectively (South Asian S tudies, 2011) that is to in height(predicate)y varied to UK. As a result, the wife and child keened on back to UK because of the cultural adjustment problem fleck her husband was still working only with British colleagues (Case Study).The solutions will be provided here are selecting an appropriate candidate as an expatriate and place more emphasis on cross-cultural suitability and family requirement. Cotemporary, the family element is having more important weight in expatriate selection because of non-working factors and potential influence to working expatriates (Andreason and Aaron, 2008, pp. 386-387).C (RETURNED AFTER A-FIVE-YEAR-ASSIGNMENT AND WOULD BE SENT OUT IMMEDIATELY)The problem of JKL here is almost extradite management and in detail it will be related to re-entry management. In general, after completing an international assignment, an expatriate will go back to the infrastructure country as called re-entry or repatriation (Harzing and Ruysseveldt, 2004, p.337). H owever, most repatriates will sell with culture shock after they back to the home country. Using an example of India and UK here, although many British work in India as expats for its booming economic and after their finishing assignments, back to UK, they wherefore only find they cannot work under a UK linguistic context (The world(prenominal) Herald Tribune, 2009). That may be the reason that JKL sent employee C oversea again without hesitation in order to avoid coping with culture shocks (Case Study).It is obviously that JKL need to improve their repatriate management and there are many models here from other multinational companies. JKL could Offer repatriation training, pre-departure training, and re-entry preference to employees and their families (Liu, 2005, p.129) and expats can increase the awareness of repatriation and decrease the suspense after back to the home country . Moreover, JKL could prepare a job vacancy in expatriate management division of human resource ma nagement because expatriates have conglomerate working experiences in other countries (Berman and Ursula, 2009, pp.80-81).D (NOW WORKING IN GREECE AS AN EXPATRIATE)The major issue of expatriate D in Greece now is adapting the local customs and culture in Greece although JKL had a prepared pre-departure training computer program (Case Study). In Hofstedes national culture demonstration of UK and Greece (Appendix B), the uncertainty dodging is extremely high and no long-term orientation in Greece. In the case of expatriate D, a problem of converse is occurred as well. In theoretical aspect, there four problems in cross-cultural oral communication semantics, word connotations, tone differences and differences among perceptions (Robbins and Judge, 2009, pp.407-408) and English and Greek are classified to two different language system. As a result, it will take a longer trainingprogramme to completely learn and understand a foreign language. Likewise the body language and gestures in England are jolly different to the world, for example, a V gesture means victory or peace in many countries but in England, if the palm and fingers face inward, it means up yours especially if executed with an upward jerk of the fingers ( newfangled York Times, 1996, p.E7).Consequently, post-departure training is a rational option for expatriate D to continually chance upon adjustments into Greek culture. The reason is that post-departure training is suit for expatriates living in a country which has an exclusively different culture and it can accelerate accustoming some other culture (Managing grooming and Development, 2005).E AND F (CONFUSED AFTER REPATRIATE)Expatriate E and F have similar problems after finishing their international assignments because JKL shortly have no response about their repatriate (Case Study). The problem of JKL must(prenominal) be repatriate management.The possible solution will be provided here is putting emphasis on repatriate management. In fact , in last ten years, there is an increasing number of multinational corporations focus on repatriate management while in 1990s, only few companies would condition a re-entry discussion. According to a survey in 1997, only 27% firms supposed to hold a discussion about re-entry and it had been improved in 2000s. In 2004, there are 86% companies mean to discuss the re-entry issue (Dowling, Festing and Engle, 2008, p.199). JKL could offer repatriate supports to repatriates such as give interaction to human resource management to increase the sense of loyalty so that the company can avoid losing these undergo employees (Harzing and Ruysseveldt, 2004, pp. 343-344).G (THOUGHT GREEK DISCRIMINATE AGAINST FEMALE)From expatriate Gs case, it seems Greek dis same(p) the idea of female even she is well qualified or experienced (Case Study). Thus, for JKL, it shallinvestigate the culture and even the working environment in Greece.From Hofstedes national culture model, UK and Greece own almost t he same figure in masculinity and Greece real has a lower masculinity figure than UK (Appendix B). However, the power distance in Greece is much higher than it in UK which means whatever a male or female, their ideas are hardly applied to supervisors as an employee.In Greek working condition, it is surprisingly to find much evidence of discrimination against female. According to an decreed report written by Greek Helsinki Monitor (GHM) and the creative activity Organisation against wring (OMCT) (2002, pp.13-21), there are approximately 4500 rapes in working communities every year and only 6% are reported to police. Furthermore, knowledgeable harassment in communities is common in Greece due to no precise legislation of sexual harassment. Those factors may be the reasons of Greek male employees carve up against female in the working place.In JKLs view, it is a altercate to solve this problem as well, one of the effective ways is send a male expatriate sort of of female employ ee in Greece to stay any hidden risks in Greece and make further investigation in Greek subsidiaries.ORGANISATIONFrom the case study, JKL have a high expatriate failure rate (Exceed 46%) in subsidiaries drop USA (Appendix F). JKL has compensable a low attention on cross culture management because it applies a localised managerial system and most managers in the subsidiaries are from the host countries. In fact, many multicultural corporations which apply localised managerial system have the same issue in manage culture difference (theme focalize for Vocational Education Research, 2006, p.1).According to Brunstein (1995, pp. 275-280), a localised managerial system will positively fit the local context and it is easier to charter profit same(p) autonomy units in a shorter of time than centralized management system. However, the drawbacks are employees especially the expatriates from the parent company will probably face a hugeculture shock in the subsidiary if their cultures ar e totally different. As a result, JKL must unloosen many improvements in human resource department especially in expatriate management field.If JKL continually applies a localised managerial system in acquired firms, it may only have problems on expatriates management. However, once the supervisors intended to displace the whole management system into a country with entirely different national culture like flag-planting, it definitely will vex a serious impact to the target subsidiary and the worst significance may like the failure of Japanisation entering UK in 1990s.CONCLUSIONThe main problem that JKL has is on its international human resource management as a part of managerial system. In the case study, seven expatriate had a range of typical expatriate problems comprising training, expatriate selection and repatriate management. Moreover, 43 per cent of expatriate left JKL after their repatriation and at least(prenominal) 46 per cent of expatriate cannot complete their tour in subsidiaries except USA. In short, those fundamental factors of expatriates problems are totally based on various national cultures that JKL need to take account in its cross culture management.PART TWOAPPRAISE THE DECENTRALISED MANAGERIAL SYSTEMS OF JKL APPLIED IN RUSSIAN AFFILIATEINTRODUCTIONLike national cultures, many companies have developed their own organisational culture as well as managerial structure. Organisational structure is important to multinational corporations because it will definitely interact with different national cultures in host countries (Francesco and Gold, 2005, p.236). In the case study, JKL applies apolycentric check into system in Malaysia, India and Greece and decision making authority is awarded to subsidiaries in order to avoid drawbacks on the motivation and political problems in these countries (Stonehouse _et al_, 2004, pp.382-383). As a result, those subsidiaries make profit very shortly (Case Study).This essay will evaluate Jim Flinns pro posal who intends to organ transplant a whole managerial system from JKL headquarter to its Russian affiliate.STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESS OF JKLS AND ZAGORSKIS STRUCTURES AND MANAGERIAL SYSTEMSAt the headquarter in UK and its affiliate in USA, JKL uses a decentralised management structure and employees will be empowered to make decisions on their own works (Case Study). Currently, many European multinational companies applied decentralised managerial structure and developed an organisational culture called old boys network with high autonomy (Bartlett, Ghoshal and Birkinshaw 2003 pp.342-343). Decentralised structure is one of the most advantageful management systems in transnational corporations which has experienced a long time modification and has generated many derivative systems. chthonic this system, diverse standards are made to fit specific manufacturing cases and it will stir developing new and innovative products (Johnson _et al_, 2008, p. 166). For JKL, it is a brilliant ch oice because innovation is actually a crucial factor to a pharmaceutical company.Yet, the anemic point of this system is hard to implement global business strategies because those subsidiaries are working as autonomies while Zagorski employ to apply a centralised structure which renowned for the efficiency of implements business strategies. Furthermore, JKL developed a observe system with performance appraisal in headquarter and USA which can significantly motivate employees in working place (Decenzo and Robbins, 1999, pp. 292-294). However, there are a few weaknesses of performance appraisal system. For example, a report from General galvanic (GE) which applied performance appraisal system and it found that those employees who received a honest but negative feedback from supervisors would actually not motivated them but decrease the motivation in their work(Oberg, 2000, p. 64). On the contrast, a centralised structure has a formal bureaucracy system with a tall hierarchy and f ixed official duties (Francesco and Gold 2005, pp.240-241).This structure is therefore suit for small or middle-sized companies at the beginning stage for effective concord power in strategy implementation (Jeong, 2001, p. 446). One the other hand, the economist (2004, p.33) found that with the increasing size of firms, a centralised structure will constantly lose the efficiency of decision making process with the complicated bureaucracy system and the employees will get used to receive orders from supervisors instead of expressing their own idea. In addition, there is no performance related rewards in Zagorski because a tall hierarchy management system proposed to make a uniform management system by formalised, vertical and fair control so that regulations are designed to fit every employee as a same unit (Czinkota, Ronkainen and Moffett, 1999, p.712).NATIONAL CULTURE DIFFERENCESJKL used to transplant their management system to its subsidiary in USA and it succeederful worked. This is the main reason that Jim Flinn, the former manager in US affiliate wants to transplant the system to Russia again.Before making the final decision, it is necessary to analyse the reasons of this success in USA. As main economics in Europe and due north America, there are many similarities in the national culture of UK and USA. According to Harris, Moran and Moran (2004, pp.297-298, pp. 437-440), free enterprise, culture affinity, English speaking, private, good manners, aggressive and self-realisation are the common key words of American and British. Moreover, in Hofstedes national culture model (Appendix C), the national culture of USA and UK are almost the same and in uncertainty avoidance column, USA is slightly higher than UK.However, Russia is totally a different country in East Europe. First, employees in Russia are regarded as a kind of cost rather than a resource (organisational Dynamics, 1999, p.75). Second, beside the language usage, all management decisions are m ade by supervisors in business context.Furthermore, Russian basically have a dense time sense and they intend to work collectively (Harris, Moran and Moran, 2004, pp.497-500). In Hofstedes national culture demonstration (Appendix D), Russia has a higher power distances, lower individualism, higher uncertainty avoidance and no long term orientation compared to UK and USA. From a report, Russian firms used to apply a reactor business strategy in order to meet immediate need instead of long term benefits but most of those companies are finally failed (Milles and Snow, 1978, p. 353). applicable CASESAfter culture analysis, it is showed that there is a huge difference in national culture between Russia and UK. Hence, it is not sure that Jim Flinn will still succeed again in his transplanting programme.Look back at history, in 1990s, Japanisation once became a popular word in UK and Toyota open up its manufacturing plant in Derby in 1992 because there was an existing practiced engineer ing workforce there (The Independent, 1992, p.23). During the early 1990s only about 55000 people were employed by Nipponese companies in the UK (The ledger, 1999). Japanisation is a Japanese managerial system with Cost-centred Just in Time System, long term contracts, vertical integration to supplier and low labour turnover rate (Hasegawa, 2001, pp.165-166).However, once Japanese manager attempted to entirely implement this system into British subsidiaries, it was not worked effectively with British employees and many Japanese companies like Nissan finally failed in UK market because Japanese manufacturing method did not fit British economic and culture conditions with collective working method (Procter and Ackroyd, 1998, p. 241, pp.244-245). In Hofstedes national culture model (Appendix E), Japan is a collective, success oriented and long term oriented country with high uncertainty avoidance which is almost an opposite of UK.It is recommended to apply a centralised managerial st ructure in Russia because many most Russian companies applied a traditional production-oriented culture with strong factory patriotism just like atypical Soviet traditions (Clarke, 2004, p. 418). In 2003, IKEA opened its first retention in Russia and many Swedish worked in IKEA Russia as expatriates. After repatriation, their feedbacks are high power distance in the working place accompanied with rigid centralised management structures (Jonsson, 2008, p.34).Despite the nation culture of Russia throw a high power distance, there are some self-reliant states in Russia which has rich unexplored natural resources such as Komi and Sakhalin actually have a more decentralised culture and many Dutch petroleum and pharmaceutical companies had established their affiliates with decentralised management structures in those regions (Condon, and Dauman, 1993, p.31). betokenAccording to the case study, Jim Flinn intends to use a top-down change approach to transplant the managerial structure w hich may be imposed in a coercive manner (Balogun and Hailey, 2004, p.27). Once Jim Flinn has completely applied the management system that used in the headquarter and USA, the employees in Russian subsidiaries have to cope with a huge culture difference from West Europe. Jim Flinn may draw attention on the success of Dutch pharmaceutical companies in Russia as mentioned before. Thus, in a short term, transition will be a main issue in Russian subsidiary and it probably will take a long time in this process. However, in a long term perspective, the management structure of JKLs headquarter may bring a range of benefits because a decentralised management system is simply helpful in research and development department although the Russian employees are used to reluctant in changes (Case Study).CONCLUSIONThe main problem of JKLs Russian affiliate is culture adjustment if Jim Flinn transplants the whole management structure from JKL to Zagorski. In fact, national culture will strongly i nfluence the organisational culture as well as managerial framework of a company. changing management system in asubsidiary is not a flag-planting work because of various national cultures mingled. In the first part of essay, some expatriates actually have problems on their international assignments in India and Greece. Hence, it can be estimated that, after the transplantation, many local employees working in Russia subsidiaries may have the same problems. Furthermore, many previous cases above are provided which could be used as a reference to Jim Flinn as well.CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONSThis essay examined the problems in managing expatriates in JKL and evaluated the proposal from Jim Flinn who will transplant a British managerial system to a Russian subsidiary. Through these analyses, it is concluded that national culture will influence both expatriates and organisational cultures. It is essential for multinational corporations to have a good command of human resource manag ement because of the large counterweight budget of expatriates and efficiency of implementing business strategies. Managerial structure, on the other hand, it cannot be easily changed and sometime it will bring a series negative consequences in real business context because national cultures are involved as well.JKL have to improve its human resource department especially repatriate division and training programme to offer better supports to expatriates and eventually, there is a suggestion to Jim Flinn which is making further investigations on previous cases and local subsidiariesREFERENCEAndreason and Aaron, W. (2008), Expatriate Adjustment of Spouses and Expatriate Managers An Integrative Research come off, _external journal of worry_, 25(2), pp.386-387.Around The World in Eighty Years.Arusha Times (2009), Trends in wariness of military personnel choice in Civil Service, p.16, 28 March, 2009.Balogun, J. and V. H. Hailey (2004), _Exploring Strategic Change_, p.27. Pearson Edu cation Limited, Essex, England.Bartlett, C., S. Ghoshal and J. Birkinshaw (2003), _Transnational Management Text, Cases, and Readings in Cross-Border Management_, pp. 342-343, McGraw-Hill, Singapore.Berman, W. and Ursula (2009), global Assignments and the Career Management of Repatriates The Boundaryless Career Concept, _International Journal of Management_, 26(1), pp.80-81.Brunstein, I. (1995), _Human Resource Management in Western Europe_, pp. 275-280, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany.Business Recorder (2011), Economic Development, 27 February, 2011.Business Wire (1998), Expatriate Resources Corporate Update, 26 March, 1998.Carrell, R. M., F. N. Elbert and D. R. Hatfield (2000), _Human Resource Management, Strategies for Managing a divers(a) and Global get goingforce, Six Edition_, p.129, p.315, The Dryden Press, Harcourt College Publisher, Orlando, USA.Chen, Y. R., (2006), _Research on Managing Groups and Teams_, p.2, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, UK.Clarke, S. (2004), A in truth Soviet Form of Capitalism? The Management of Holding Companies in Russia, _Post-Communist Economies_, 16(4), p.418.Condon, J. and J. Dauman (1993), New realities and prospects for Westernbusiness in the new Russia of decentralising regions, _European Business Journal_, 5(2), p.31.Czinkota, M. R., I. A. Ronkainen and M., H., Moffett (1999), International Business, pp. 712, The Dryden Press, Harcourt Brace College Publishers, Orlando, USA.Decenzo, D. A. and S. P. Robbins (1999_), Human Resource Management, Sixth Edition_, pp.292-294, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, USA.Dowling, P. J., M. Festing and A. D. Engle (2008), _International Human Resource Management Managing People in a Multinational Context_, p.120, p. 199, p.217, South-Western, London, UK.economic expert (2004), Centralised intelligence?, 373(8405), p.33.Francesco, A. M. and B. A. Gold (2005), _International Organisational Behaviour, Second Edition_, p. 236, pp. 240-241, Pearson prentice Hall, New Jersey, U SA.Gielen, A. C., M. J. M. Kerkhofs and O. J. C. Van (2010), How performance related pay affects productivity and employment, _Journal of Population Economics_, 23(1), p.299.Gordon, K. (2010), What Employees indirect request, _Campaign_, p.56, 1 March, 2010.Greek Helsinki Monitor and the World Organisation against Torture (2002), _Violence against Women__In Greece_, pp.13-21, July, 2002.Harris, H., C. Brewster and P. Sparrow (2003), _International Human Resource Management_, p. 91, p.94, Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, CIPD House, London. UK.Hall, W. (1995), _Managing Cultures, make Strategic Relationships lop_, p.6, John Wiley and Sons Ltd., West Sussex, England.Harris, P. R., R. T. Moran and S. V. Moran (2004), _Managing Cultural Differences, Sixth Edition_, pp.297-298, pp. 437-440, pp. 497-500, Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK.Harzing, A. W. and J. V. Ruysseveldt (2004), _International Human Resource Management_, p. 337, pp. 343-344, SAGE Publicatio ns Ltd., London, UK.Hasegawa, H. (2001), Globalization and Japanisation implications for human resource management in Britain, _Japan Forum_, 13(2), pp.165-166.Hofstede, G. (1991), _Cultures and Organisations_, p.2, McGraw Hill, Maidenhead, UK.Hofstede, G. (1992a), National Culture of UK and India. getable at http//geert-hofstede.com/united-kingdom-and- india.html. Accessed 20 December 2011.Hofstede, G. (1992b), National Culture of UK and Greece. Available at http//geert-hofstede.com/united-kingdom-and-greece.html. Accessed 20 December 2011.Hofstede, G. (1992c), National Culture of UK and USA. Available at http//geert-hofstede.com/united-kingdom-and- united-states.html. Accessed 20 December 2011.Hofstede, G. (1992d), National Culture of UK and Russia. Available at http//geert-hofstede.com/united-kingdom-and- russia.html. Accessed 20 December 2011.Hofstede, G. (1992e), National Culture of UK and Russia. Available at http//geert-hofstede.com/united-kingdom-and- japan.html. Accessed 2 1 December 2011.Jeong, J. (2001), Pursuing centralised bargaining in an era of decentralisation?, _Industrial Relations Journal_, 32(1), p. 446.Johnson, Gerry, Scholes and Kevan (2008), _Exploring Corporate Strategy (8th edition)_, p. 166, Harlow, Essex Financial Times and Prentice Hall, London, UK.Joneeon, A. (2008), a transnational perspective on knowledge sharing lessons learned from IKEAs entry into Russia, China and Japan, _International Review of Retail, Distribution & Consumer Research_, 18(1), p. 34.Liu, C. H. (2009), The effectuate of Repatriates Overseas Assignment Experiences on Turnover Intentions, _Journal of American Academy of Business_, 7(1), p.129.Managing Training and Development (2005), Culture Training How to Prepare Your Expatriate Employees for Cross-Cultural Work Environments, p.2, February, 2005.Milles, R. and C. Snow (1978), Organisational Strategy, Structure and Process, p.353, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.Neale, M. A., M. A. Elizabeth and Y. R. Chen (2006), _National culture and groups_, p. 26, Bingley, U.KNational Centre for Vocational Education Research (2006), Managing CultureMaking Culture Work for You, p.1, March, 2006.New York Times (1996), Whats A-O-K in the U.S.A. Is Lewd and Worthless beyond, p. E7, 18 August, 1996.Oberg, W. (2000), Make performance appraisal relevant, _Harvard Business Review_, 50(1), p. 64.Organizational Dynamics (1999), Doing Business in Russia Effective Human Resource Management Practices for Foreign Firms in Russia, 28(2), p.75.Procter, S. and S. Ackroyd (1998), Against Japanisatoin Understanding the Reorganisation of British Manufacturing, _Employee Relations_, 20(3), p.241, pp. 244-245.Robbins, S. P. and T. A. Judge (2009), _Organizational Behavior, Pearson International Edition_, p.336, pp. 407-408, Pearson Education Inc., New Jersey, USA.Robert, C., Probst, T. M., Martocchio, J. J., Drasgow, F. and J. J. Lawler (2000), Empowerment and continuous improvement in the united States, Mexico, Poland, and India predicting fit on the basis of the dimensions of power distance and individualism, _The Journal of Applied Psychology_, 85(5), pp.654-656.South Asian Studies (2011), The State, Media, Religion and Emerging Challenges in India, 26 (1), July, 2011.Stonehouse, G., D. Campbell, J. Hamill and T. Purdie (2004), _Global and Transnational Business, Strategy and Management_, pp. 382-383, John Wiley and Sons Ltd, West Sussex, England.The Independent (1992), Britains drive parts suppliers learn Japanese, p.23, 8 June, 1992.The International Herald Tribune (2009), A Reverse Culture Shock in India Workers Returning Home father It Hard to Cope with Clash between Two Worlds, p.10, 28 November, 2009.The Journal (1999), Japanese bring 150 more jobs 5m investment in Tees valley, p.26, 8 September, 1999.